The Best Hedge Funds for Exceptional Investment Returns

Quants, macro masters, activists — and one Omaha legend. A living list, updated regularly.

Living List Research-Heavy Last reviewed: Oct 2025 Updated: Nov 2025

Latest changes:

• Added Davidson Kempner + ARK Invest to the 2025 list.
• Refreshed Elliott fee notes and updated access details.
• Improved Citadel section with new “Retail Playbook” and stats framing.
• Added internal links to Insider Purchases, Value, Growth/IPOs, and International hubs.

This living list is reviewed quarterly. Profiles may be refined as new filings, letters, or performance disclosures come in.

---

Quick heads-up: We’re refreshing and reorganizing this living list to make it even sharper, clearer, and more fun to navigate. You may see the furniture move around a bit this week — promise we won’t break anything.

---

Disclosure: This page may include affiliate links. This is research, not advice.

---

Introduction

Selecting the right hedge funds can be a game-changer for your portfolio. This guide compiles a living list of 17 firms and legends that have consistently (or close enough) delivered exceptional performance.

We’ll cover performance history, leadership, portfolio themes and top holdings, what investors love (and should watch), plus practical takeaways for individuals.

Why trust these reviews?

• 30+ years around markets: I’ve seen deep drawdowns, bull runs, wins and whiffs — and learned from all of it.
• Studying the pros matters: managers like Warren Buffett, Ray Dalio, Ken Griffin, Jim Simons, Cliff Asness, Bill Ackman, Carl Icahn, etc., have durable edges worth understanding or emulating.
• I’m the founder of MLI (ml-inc.com) and other ventures; clients/prospects have included tech/fintech/biotech institutions and some of the funds listed here.

What we compare

• Strategy & risk framework
• Manager reputation & firm longevity
• Portfolio quality & key holdings
• Investment rationale & positioning
• Fees, minimums, and access constraints

Table of Contents

---

Best Hedge Funds: Profiles

Tip: Add the matching id to each fund section header so the TOC links work.

1. Citadel LLC

Structure: Hedge fund (Multistrat / Quant-heavy) • Updated: Nov 2025

At-a-glance

• Edge: World-class research and tight risk controls; diversified multistrategy engine.
• Watch-outs: High fees; access limited; performance can be lumpy.
• Great for: Institutions/allocators; retail “idea mining.”

Quick stats

• AUM: Verify current
• Minimum: Often restricted
• Fees: Premium management + performance fee

Fred’s Take: One of the few machines that can turn chaos into basis points—until it doesn’t. Not for the faint of heart, but unmatched signal density when the engine is humming.

How to emulate (for individuals): Diversified factor tilts; strict risk rules; treat 13F holdings as lagged context, not triggers.

Notes & history (high level):

• Founded in 1990 by Ken Griffin; large multi-asset platform spanning equities, credit/convertibles, commodities, and global macro.
• Heavy use of quantitative research and technology; extensive risk testing and stress frameworks.
• Access typically limited; investor terms can be premium.

Visit site  ·  Read the full Citadel review

---

2. Bridgewater Associates

Structure: Hedge fund (Global Macro / Systematic) • Updated: Nov 2025

At-a-glance

• Edge: Deep macro research + systematic process; pioneered risk parity (All Weather).
• Watch-outs: Access limited; performance can be cycle-dependent; complexity isn’t for everyone.
• Great for: Institutions; retail “idea mining” on macro/risk-parity concepts.

Quick stats

• AUM: Verify current
• Minimum: Restricted / institutional
• Fees: Management + performance (varies by vehicle)

Fred’s Take: Macro chess, not checkers. When the process maps the regime, it hums; when the regime shifts abruptly, it stress-tests everyone’s convictions.

How to emulate (individuals): Risk-balanced allocation (stocks/bonds/commodities), humility about regimes, and rebalancing discipline.

Visit site  ·  Read the full Bridgewater review

---

3. Renaissance Technologies

Structure: Hedge fund (Quant / Statistical Arbitrage) • Updated: Nov 2025

At-a-glance

• Edge: Dense data + advanced modeling; short-horizon signal extraction at scale.
• Watch-outs: Access essentially closed; the famed Medallion fund is internal only.
• Great for: Institutions via selected vehicles; retail “idea mining” on factor thinking and discipline.

Quick stats

• AUM: Verify current
• Minimum: Restricted / institutional
• Fees: Premium management + performance fees (by vehicle)

Fred’s Take: When your median holding period is basically “a long lunch,” discipline is the alpha. Signals fade; risk doesn’t—position sizing is everything.

How to emulate (individuals): Diversify factors, don’t chase micro-signals, and respect costs/turnover—most retail edges die in slippage.

Visit site  ·  Read the full Renaissance review

---

4. Elliott Investment Management L.P.

Structure: Hedge fund (Activist / Multi-Strategy) • Updated: Nov 2025

At-a-glance

• Edge: Activist investing, distressed and non-distressed credit, complex arbitrage.
• Watch-outs: Typically closed to new investors; limited transparency; event-driven volatility.
• Great for: Investors studying activism, corporate turnarounds, and uncorrelated event trades.

Fred’s Take: One of the savviest activist funds alive—half negotiator, half tactician. Elliott creates value by outworking everyone else. It’s activism with spreadsheets, not slogans.

How to emulate (individuals): Focus on catalysts, special situations, and asymmetric trades where skill—not luck—drives outcome.

Visit site  ·  Read the full Elliott review

---

5. Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

Structure: Conglomerate / Public Company • Updated: Nov 2025

At-a-glance

• Edge: Durable compounding machine; fortress balance sheet; unrivaled leadership record.
• Watch-outs: Slower growth from size; leadership succession risk.
• Great for: Long-term investors seeking exposure to quality businesses without fund fees.

Fred’s Take: Not technically a hedge fund—just the yardstick everyone else measures against. Buffett built a cash-flow cathedral; Munger designed the stained glass.

How to emulate (individuals): Buy quality, hold forever, read incessantly, and resist excitement.

Visit site  ·  Read the full Berkshire review

---

6. Pershing Square Capital Management

Structure: Hedge fund (Concentrated Long/Short Equity) • Updated: Nov 2025

At-a-glance

• Edge: Concentrated, high-conviction bets; Buffett-style value with an activist twist.
• Watch-outs: Public visibility amplifies pressure; bold calls can backfire.
• Great for: Investors seeking transparency, deep dives, and lessons in conviction sizing.

Fred’s Take: Bill Ackman invests like Buffett—only louder, faster, and occasionally with fireworks. When he wins, he wins big; when he loses, it’s a masterclass in humility and risk management.

How to emulate (individuals): Own fewer stocks you truly understand, hedge intelligently, and remember: sometimes “doing nothing” is the hardest trade.

Visit site  ·  Read the full Pershing review

---

7. AQR Capital Management

Structure: Quantitative / Multi-Factor / Global Macro • Updated: Nov 2025

At-a-glance

• Edge: Factor-based investing—value, momentum, carry, and defensive styles—executed with academic precision.
• Watch-outs: Models can lag in extreme regimes; patience required.
• Great for: Investors craving data-driven diversification and systematic discipline.

Fred’s Take: If finance had a physics department, AQR would run it. Cliff Asness and team turn economic intuition into repeatable math—boring in the best possible way.

How to emulate (individuals): Diversify across factors, size positions systematically, and never confuse a model with reality.

Visit site  ·  Read the full AQR review

---

8. D.E. Shaw & Co.

Structure: Quant / Multi-Strategy / Hybrid Systematic • Updated: Nov 2025

At-a-glance

• Edge: Three decades of quant research and risk discipline spanning equities, credit, and macro futures.
• Watch-outs: Opaque models; requires trust in math over emotion.
• Great for: Investors drawn to systematic diversification and high-tech finance laboratories disguised as hedge funds.

Fred’s Take: Imagine a physics lab that prints alpha. D.E. Shaw has the quants, the servers, and the swagger to pull it off — and even Jeff Bezos once wrote code there.

How to emulate (individuals): Track signals systematically, respect risk limits, and treat emotion as a bug in your software.

Visit site · Read the full D.E. Shaw review

---

9. Baker Brothers Advisors LP

Structure: Biotech / Healthcare Long-Only Hedge Fund • Updated: Nov 2025

At-a-glance

• Edge: Biotech specialists with decades of clinical and academic insight and a buy-and-hold mentality rare in hedge fund land.
• Watch-outs: Ultra-concentrated sector exposure — volatility is a feature, not a bug.
• Great for: Healthcare investors who want to follow the smartest money in biotech without getting a Ph.D. in immunology.

Fred’s Take: The Baker Brothers are to biotech what the Wright brothers were to flight — visionaries who actually get things off the ground.

How to emulate (individuals): Study their top holdings, focus on cash-flow-viable biotechs, and remember — diversification is for the immune-compromised.

View 13F holdings · Read the full Baker Bros review

---

10. Balyasny Asset Management (BAM)

Structure: Multi-PM / Multi-Strategy (L/S Equities core) • Updated: Nov 2025

At-a-glance

• Edge: Deep bench of sector L/S teams, reborn with a heavier risk spine post-2018.
• Watch-outs: Platform complexity; results hinge on PM selection and tight risk execution.
• Great for: Allocators seeking diversified alpha engines; individuals “idea mining” sectors.

Fred’s Take: BAM is a comeback story: humbled in 2018, rebuilt with risk at the center, and now a disciplined platform where stock picking meets grown-up guardrails.

How to emulate (individuals): Run sector books with clear gross/net, size positions by edge persistence, and pre-write exit rules.

Visit site · Read the full BAM review

---

11. Tiger Global Management

Structure: Public L/S + Private Growth Equity • Updated: Nov 2025

At-a-glance

• Edge: Sharp eye for category leaders across internet/software/consumer/fintech — public and private.
• Watch-outs: High cyclicality and volatility; 2022 was a historic drawdown.
• Great for: Momentum-plus-quality idea mining; understanding tech leadership stacks.

Fred’s Take: A rocket you don’t board lightly. When Tiger gets the secular trends right, it flies; when liquidity regimes flip, brace for G-forces.

How to emulate (individuals): Own proven platform winners, cap position size, and always respect macro liquidity.

Visit site · Read the full Tiger Global review

---

12. Millennium Management

Structure: Multi-Manager / Multi-Strategy • Updated: Nov 2025

At-a-glance

• Edge: One of the most consistent return profiles in hedge-fund history — diversified, disciplined, and process-driven.
• Watch-outs: Limited transparency; difficult for outsiders to grasp inner mechanics.
• Great for: Investors studying portfolio diversification, risk-parity design, and systematic consistency.

Fred’s Take: Millennium is the tortoise in a field of racing hares — slow, methodical, and astonishingly steady. A reminder that risk management, not charisma, compounds returns.

How to emulate (individuals): Diversify ruthlessly, track exposures across all dimensions, and focus on process over prediction.

Visit site · Read the full Millennium review

---

13. Two Sigma Investments

Structure: Quant / AI / Multi-Asset • Updated: Nov 2025

At-a-glance

• Edge: AI-driven, data-heavy quant powerhouse — where science and markets intersect.
• Watch-outs: Internal founder disputes; complex systems not built for outsiders.
• Great for: Investors fascinated by machine learning, data-mining, and quant diversification.

Fred’s Take: If Renaissance is alchemy, Two Sigma is physics. A hedge fund where servers hum, models evolve, and even the walls probably run regressions.

How to emulate (individuals): Blend data and intuition, test ideas relentlessly, and accept that no model is final — only better until it breaks.

Visit site · Read the full Two Sigma review

---

14. Viking Global Investors

Structure: Long/Short Equity + Long-Only + Private Equity • Updated: Nov 2025

At-a-glance

• Edge: Research-intensive stock picking across public and private markets; disciplined by sector pods.
• Watch-outs: Periodic sizing/scale shifts; access can be constrained.
• Great for: Idea-mining across quality large caps and selective growth/private names.

Fred’s Take: A Tiger Cub with patience and polish. Viking won’t always be the hottest hand, but its research machine is a repeatable idea engine.

How to emulate (individuals): Build watchlists by industry, write pre-mortems for each position, and size positions by conviction × liquidity.

Visit site · Read the full Viking review

---

15. ARK Invest

Structure: Active ETFs (Public) + Venture (Retail-accessible) • Updated: Nov 2025

At-a-glance

• Edge: High-conviction focus on disruptive innovation; exceptional transparency (daily trades, open research).
• Watch-outs: Elevated volatility; rate-sensitive growth exposures; some positions may never reach profitability.
• Great for: Retail and pros tracking secular innovators (AI, genomics, autonomy, fintech, space).

Fred’s Take: ARK is growth—unfiltered. You’ll feel the drawdowns, but the research firehose and visibility are unmatched for learning and idea flow.

How to emulate (individuals): Ladder entries, cap position sizes, and pair high-beta innovators with cash-flow winners to tame portfolio variance.

Visit site · Read the full ARK review

---

16. Davidson Kempner Capital Management

Structure: Multi-Strategy • Event-Driven • Credit & Special Situations • Updated: Nov 2025

At-a-glance

• Edge: Four decades of disciplined, drawdown-aware execution across credit/equity/event-driven.
• Watch-outs: Lower octane than “shoot-the-moon” peers; access varies by vehicle.
• Great for: Steadier compounding, idea mining in complex credit and corporate actions.

Fred’s Take: Not the flashiest—but DK’s longevity and crisis handling are the point. The playbook is patience, process, and asymmetric setups, especially in credit.

How to emulate (individuals): Study capital structures around catalysts (mergers, spin-offs, restructurings). Insist on downside math before upside dreams.

Visit site · Read the full Davidson Kempner review

---

17. Coatue Management

Structure: Tech Growth (Public + Private) • Updated: Nov 2025

At-a-glance

• Edge: Early mapping of secular tech waves; founder-led bias; deep data platform for portfolio companies.
• Watch-outs: Tech cycle beta; private marks can lag reality in abrupt downturns.
• Great for: Surfing innovation trends (AI, fintech, climate tech) and sourcing public/late-stage ideas.

Fred’s Take: If you want to see where the puck might be going in tech, Coatue’s mosaic often gets there first — with public names you know and private ones you soon will.

How to emulate (individuals): Track secular themes, back founder-operators, and demand leading indicators (user growth, retention, unit economics) before upping size.

Visit site · Read the full Coatue review

---

FUNDS START HERE

1. Citadel — Full Review

Note: This is the expanded deep-dive. The at-a-glance card above summarizes strengths, cautions, fees, and emulation tips.

Profile

• Founded in 1990 by Kenneth C. Griffin.
• Large multi-asset platform spanning equities, credit/convertibles, commodities, and global macro.
• Invests on behalf of institutions such as universities and healthcare organizations, aiming for durable long-term returns.
• Citadel Securities (affiliated market-making firm) is a major electronic market maker serving a wide range of clients.
• Global Quantitative Strategies leverages proprietary research, statistical modeling, and technology across asset classes.
• Strategic investments have included outside capital in affiliated businesses and consideration of public-market options over time.

Key Strategic Focus

1. Commodities — Energy (oil, power, refined products), agriculture, and related markets.
2. Credit & Convertibles — Corporate/convertible bonds, preferreds, credit & equity derivatives, bank loans, CLOs.
3. Equities — Often market-neutral, rooted in fundamental research and disciplined risk controls (long/short, event-driven, volatility).
4. Global Fixed Income & Macro — Rates, sovereigns, inflation, currencies, EM, commodities, and credit; views shaped by macro policy and relative-value opportunities.

Risk Management

• Historical stress events have included the 2007–2008 crisis (meaningful losses and temporary withdrawal limits), followed by a sharp rebound in 2009.
• Emphasis on stress testing, risk capital allocation, and liquidity management across thousands of instruments.

Top Executive: Kenneth C. Griffin

• Founder, Chief Executive Officer, and Co-Chief Investment Officer.
• Began investing while at Harvard; early success attracted seed backing to launch Citadel.
• Known for significant philanthropy and a prominent profile in business and culture.

Funds

• Wellington (flagship)
• Global Equities
• Tactical Trading
• Global Fixed Income

Portfolio Snapshot (illustrative)

• Highly diversified; individual positions typically represent a small share of total exposure.
• Thousands of line items across sectors and instruments.
• Blue-chip and large-cap technology exposures can feature prominently in public disclosures at various times.

Minimum Investment

Minimums are often high and access can be restricted or invitation-only; terms vary by vehicle.

Fee Structure

Premium management and performance-based fees are common for top multi-strategy platforms; specifics vary by fund and share class.

What I Like / Dislike

• Like: Multi-engine platform, strong research culture, robust risk discipline; historically strong years demonstrate significant alpha potential.
• Dislike: Premium fees, potential performance lumpiness, and limited access; past gating during crisis periods is a consideration for some allocators.

Recent Notes

• Corporate developments have included a relocation of headquarters to Miami and continued platform expansion.

Learn more: Visit Citadel

↑ Back to top

---

2. Bridgewater — Full Review

Note: Expanded deep-dive; the card above is your quick snapshot.

Profile

• Founded by Ray Dalio; global-macro research firm with systematic implementation.
• Flagship strategies include Pure Alpha (active macro) and All Weather (risk-parity, strategic beta).
• Institutional client base; culture emphasizes radical transparency and process repeatability.

Strategy Architecture

• Pure Alpha: Diversified macro bets across rates, FX, equities, credit, and commodities, driven by researched cause-and-effect linkages.
• All Weather: Risk-balanced exposures designed to weather inflation/growth regimes with periodic rebalancing.

Risk Management

• Emphasis on scenario analysis, stress testing, and explicit risk budgeting across asset classes.

Access, Minimums, Fees

• Generally institutional access; minimums can be high, terms vary by product.
• Fees reflect active macro and portfolio-engineering sophistication.

What I Like / Dislike

• Like: Process clarity, regime thinking, and a robust risk framework that’s teachable.
• Dislike: Limited access; active macro can face periods of whipsaw or crowding.

Recent Notes

• Leadership has professionalized beyond the founder; process remains institutionalized.

Learn more: Visit Bridgewater

↑ Back to top

---

3. Renaissance — Full Review

Note: Expanded deep-dive; the card above is your quick snapshot.

Profile

• Founded by mathematician Jim Simons; pioneering quant firm known for statistical arbitrage.
• Medallion is internal/employee-only; external vehicles (e.g., institutional equity funds) have different mandates and characteristics.
• Research culture, data engineering, and model life-cycle management are core differentiators.

Strategy Architecture

• Short- to medium-horizon signals across equities, futures, and other liquid markets; large-scale portfolio construction and constant model evaluation.
• Emphasis on breadth and ensemble effects rather than single big bets.

Risk Management

• Tight exposure control, rapid de-risking of decaying signals, and rigorous execution to limit slippage/impact.

Access, Minimums, Fees

• Access limited; institutional minimums; fee structures reflect active alpha capture and capacity scarcity.

What I Like / Dislike

• Like: Relentless research loop, disciplined capital allocation, world-class execution.
• Dislike: Practical inaccessibility for most individuals; external funds ≠ Medallion.

Recent Notes

• Ongoing succession and professionalized leadership; research pipeline remains the core asset.

Learn more: Visit Renaissance

↑ Back to top

---

4. Elliott — Full Review

Note: Expanded deep-dive. The quick card above gives the elevator pitch; this one gives the full flight plan.

Profile

• Founded in 1977 by Paul E. Singer with $1.3 million from family and friends.
• Among the oldest hedge funds under continuous management; relocating headquarters to West Palm Beach, Florida.
• As of mid-2025, manages roughly $59 billion with about 550 employees—half devoted to research and portfolio analysis.
• Known for a disciplined culture, due process, and relentless pursuit of value in complex or distressed situations.

Strategy Architecture

• Originated in convertible arbitrage and evolved into a multi-strategy platform spanning equities, credit, private equity, real estate, and commodities.
• Distressed & special-situations investing: seeks opportunity in defaulted or near-defaulted debt, bankruptcy processes, and corporate restructurings.
• Non-distressed credit: complex structured products, layered securitizations, and mispriced instruments demanding deep analytical horsepower.
• Arbitrage suite: event-driven, related-securities, convertible, volatility, and fixed-income arbitrage—all used for opportunistic risk management.
• Activism: builds stakes to influence management, governance, or capital allocation (recently seen with Phillips 66 and AT&T).
• Volatility & macro hedging: uses credit, gold, rates, and FX derivatives to dampen systemic shocks.

Risk Management & Culture

• Risk awareness is structural, not reactive—each trade has a thesis, exit path, and risk-reward asymmetry before capital is deployed.
• Hard-wired focus on liquidity, counterparty control, and operational rigor.
• Cultural hallmarks: tenacity, creativity, negotiation skill, and meticulous due diligence.

Founder — Paul E. Singer

• Founder, President, and Co-CEO; also Co-CIO.
• Known for shaping modern activism and sovereign-debt litigation (“vulture investing”).
• Through the Paul E. Singer Foundation and Start-Up Nation Central, supports education, tech innovation, and LGBTQ rights.
• Graduate of University of Rochester and Harvard Law School; net worth estimated around $5 billion.
• Owner of AC Milan football club—activism meets calcio.

Funds & Access

• Flagship funds include Elliott Associates L.P. and Elliott International L.P.; private-equity vehicles complement hedge operations.
• Access is often restricted; minimums may start near $5 million; terms vary.

Portfolio Snapshot

• Approx. 50 holdings with high concentration—top two (e.g., TFPM & MPC) can exceed 40 % of exposure.
• Energy verticals often prominent; positions tend toward catalyst-driven value realization rather than passive compounding.
• Limited mega-cap tech; portfolio often idiosyncratic.

Fee Structure

Standard industry range: ~1.5 % management + 20 % performance; specifics vary by share class. Always confirm with offering docs.

What I Like / Dislike

• Like: Old-school activist discipline, uncorrelated event exposure, deep credit expertise, powerful negotiation DNA.
• Dislike: Limited access for new investors; occasional reputation for aggressiveness in sovereign cases.

Recent Notes

• 2024–25: Increased stakes in energy and industrial cyclicals; continued activism campaigns for operational reforms.

Learn more: Visit Elliott Management

↑ Back to top

---

5. Berkshire Hathaway — Full Review

Note: Not a hedge fund, but a masterclass in capital allocation and risk restraint.

Profile

• Headquartered in Omaha, Nebraska; founded as a textile company (1839), transformed into a holding company by 1970.
• Core engine: insurance float reinvested into equities and wholly owned businesses.
• ~383 k employees; 2024 revenues near $300 billion; total assets approaching $950 billion.
• Chairman & CEO Warren Buffett (since 1970); late Vice Chairman Charlie Munger (1978-2023) was Buffett’s philosophical partner.
• Book value compounded ~20 % annually for half a century—double the S&P 500.

Investment Philosophy

• “It’s far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price.”
• Focus on moats, management quality, and durability of advantage.
• Prefers concentrated, long-term holdings—“Our favorite holding period is forever.”
• Low leverage; ample liquidity for opportunistic deployment.

Risk Management (in their own words)

• “Risk comes from not knowing what you are doing.”
• “Widespread fear is your friend; it serves up bargains.”
• “It takes character to sit with cash and do nothing.” — Munger
• “Diversification is protection against ignorance.” — Buffett

Key Strategic Focus

• Insurance: GEICO, General Re — cash-flow generators.
• Infrastructure: BNSF Railroad, Berkshire Energy.
• Consumer & Financial holdings: Apple, Coca-Cola, American Express, Bank of America, Chevron, Occidental, Moody’s, Kraft Heinz.
• Private subsidiaries span everything from furniture to aerospace parts.

Founder — Warren E. Buffett

• Born 1930 in Omaha; inspired by Ben Graham’s “The Intelligent Investor.”
• Studied under Graham at Columbia Business School; founded Buffett Partnership Ltd. before acquiring Berkshire.
• Philanthropy: pledged 99 % of wealth to charity; co-launched the Giving Pledge with Bill Gates.
• Estimated net worth $120 billion (2024); among the world’s most respected investors.

Portfolio Snapshot

• Top holdings (public equities): Apple (~50 % of equity portfolio), BAC, AXP, KO, CVX, OXY, KHC, MCO, DVA, HPQ.
• Roughly 90 % of value concentrated in the top 10 positions—proof of conviction.
• Holdings horizon: multi-decade; portfolio churn ≈ 0 % most years.

Access & Fee Structure

• Any investor can own Berkshire shares (NYSE: BRK.A / BRK.B).
• Class A shares ≈ $580 k each; Class B ≈ $380 (as of 2025).
• No management or performance fees—just trading commissions.

What I Like / Dislike

• Like: Exceptional compounding record, ethical culture, fortress balance sheet, timeless investor education value.
• Dislike: Succession uncertainty; growth naturally moderates with scale.

Recent Notes

• Greg Abel designated CEO successor (2021); smooth leadership transition ongoing.
• Charlie Munger passed away Nov 2023 at 99—a final chapter in investing wisdom.

Learn more: Visit Berkshire Hathaway

↑ Back to top

---

Quick Compare: Top Hedge Funds at a Glance

Before diving into the deep dives, here’s a one-screen cheat sheet summarizing strategy, edge, and accessibility for each fund. Think of it as the “Hedge Fund Buffet Sampler.” 🍽️

Fund	Core Strategy	Edge / Distinction	Founder / CEO	Approx. AUM	Access
Citadel LLC	Multi-Strategy / Quant	High-octane research engine; tight risk controls	Ken Griffin	~$60B+	Institutional / Limited
Bridgewater	Global Macro / Risk Parity	Systematic macro; “All Weather” design	Ray Dalio (Founder)	~$120B+	Institutional
Renaissance Tech	Quant / Stat Arb	Short-horizon models; Medallion legend	Jim Simons (Founder)	~$50B+	Closed (internal)
Elliott Investment Management	Activist / Event-Driven / Credit	Activism + distressed depth; sovereign workouts	Paul Singer	~$59B	Institutional / Select
Berkshire Hathaway	Value / Conglomerate	Insurance float + quality equities, decades of compounding	Warren Buffett (Chair/CEO)	~$950B assets	Public (BRK.A / BRK.B)
Pershing Square	Concentrated Long / Activist / Opportunistic	Buffett-style focus; famous hedges and shorts	Bill Ackman	~$18B+	Institutional; PSH (OTC) for public access
AQR Capital	Factor / Quant / Multi-Asset	Academic rigor; value/momentum/carry/defensive styles	Cliff Asness et al.	~$100B	Institutional + some mutual/UCITS
D.E. Shaw & Co.	Quant / Multi-Strat (Sys + Disc + Hybrid)	Pioneer quant shop; deep risk culture	David E. Shaw (Founder)	~$60B	Institutional / Limited
Baker Bros.	Biotech / Healthcare (Concentrated)	Sector mastery; long-term, conviction stakes	Felix & Julian Baker	~$23B	Institutional; limited retail focus
Balyasny Asset Mgmt (BAM)	Multi-PM / L/S Equity lead + Macro/Credit/Comm.	Re-tooled risk post-2018; diversified playbook	Dmitry Balyasny	~$120B (firmwide)	Institutional / Select
Tiger Global	Tech Growth (Public + Private)	High-beta tech leadership; idea source	Chase Coleman	~$58B (2022)	Institutional / Limited
Millennium	Multi-PM / Multi-Strat	Remarkably steady track record; huge diversification	Israel Englander	~$60B+	Institutional / Limited
Two Sigma	Quant / ML-driven Multi-Asset	AI/ML at scale; Venn risk platform	Overdeck & Siegel	~$60B	Institutional / Limited
Viking Global Investors	Fundamental L/S + Private	Tiger Cub pedigree; public + private blend	Andreas Halvorsen	~$40–50B	Institutional / Select
ARK Invest	Growth / Disruptive Innovation (Active ETFs)	High transparency; daily trades/notes	Cathie Wood	Varies (ETFs; peak ~$50B)	Public ETFs (ARKK, ARKG, etc.)
Davidson Kempner	Event-Driven / Multi-Strat	Longevity + steady returns; capital preservation	Anthony Yoseloff (CIO)	~$37B	Institutional / Select
Coatue	Tech Growth (Public + Private)	Founder-led tech focus; robust private book	Philippe Laffont	~$40B+	Institutional / Select

Source: Fund materials, filings, and industry estimates. Figures are rounded and approximate; verify current data before investing.

---

6. Pershing Square — Full Review

Note: A hybrid of value investing, activism, and creative hedging. Not for the timid—but always worth watching.

Profile

• Founded in 2004 by William (Bill) Ackman after his Gotham Partners venture; initial capital ~$50 million from personal funds and Leucadia National.
• Headquartered in New York City with under 100 employees; AUM ≈ $18–20 billion.
• Ackman hires unconventionally—past recruits have included a former fly-fishing guide and a chance taxi acquaintance. Culture prizes curiosity over pedigree.

Investment Approach

• Inspired by Warren Buffett, Ackman seeks durable franchises with pricing power and capable management.
• Maintains a highly concentrated portfolio—usually 8–12 core positions—to maximize research depth and accountability.
• Combines long-term compounding with opportunistic short or hedged trades when macro risk spikes.
• Prefers publicly traded, high-visibility companies where Pershing’s influence can unlock value through activism or governance change.

Activism Highlights

• Launched headline campaigns at McDonald’s, Wendy’s, and Herbalife.
• Valeant Pharmaceuticals (2016) — painful $4 billion loss that reshaped Ackman’s process toward discipline and humility.
• COVID-19 hedge (2020) — invested $27 million in credit protection, generating $2.6 billion within a month when markets crashed.
• Short U.S. Treasuries (2023) — a tactical macro bet that netted $200 million before being closed due to geopolitical risks.

Risk Management

• Combines macro hedges with bottom-up conviction. Ackman treats portfolio insurance as an active discipline, not an afterthought.
• After Valeant, Pershing refocused on research depth, smaller staff, and performance accountability—resulting in a 58 % gain in 2019.
• Views volatility as inevitable but survivable; designs position sizes accordingly.

Founder — Bill Ackman

• Founder & CEO; Harvard BA & MBA; Forbes net worth ≈ $3.5 billion (2025).
• Known for articulate investor letters and media presence—turns shareholder communication into an educational forum.
• Signatory of The Giving Pledge, pledging ≥ 50 % of wealth to philanthropy.

Funds & Access

• Flagships: Pershing Square L.P. and Pershing Square International L.P.
• Pershing Square Holdings Ltd (PSHZF) — publicly listed in London; accessible OTC to retail investors.
• Typical minimum ≈ $5 million for private funds.

Portfolio Snapshot (2025)

• Only ~7 positions; top 3 (CMG, QSR, HLT) ≈ 45 % of total weight.
• Sectors: restaurants, hotels, real estate, railroads, and select tech.
• Average hold: 1–3 years; turnover low by hedge-fund standards.

Fee Structure

Standard 1.5 % management + 20 % performance (after loss carryforwards). PSHZF’s public structure offers similar economics, minus lockups.

What I Like / Dislike

• Like: Transparent communications, focused portfolio, creative hedging, long-term conviction, ethics and philanthropy.
• Dislike: Personality-driven volatility—both in media and returns; occasional off-equity bets can surprise traditional investors.

Recent Notes

• Reaffirmed inflation-sensitive macro awareness; continues active dialogues on U.S. housing and interest-rate policy.

Learn more: Visit Pershing Square

↑ Back to top

---

7. AQR Capital — Full Review

Note: Where Renaissance meets academia. AQR proves that quant doesn’t have to be mystical to be powerful.

Profile

• Founded in 1998 by Cliff Asness, Robert Krail, and John Liew — University of Chicago PhD graduates.
• Headquarters: Greenwich, Connecticut • AUM ≈ $100 billion (2025) • ~1,000 employees.
• AQR stands for Applied Quantitative Research—because that’s literally what they do.

Investment Philosophy

• Applies rigorous academic research to real-world markets: value, momentum, quality/defensive, and carry factors.
• Portfolios blend fundamental economics with statistical modeling to capture persistent sources of return.
• Diversifies across styles, regions, and asset classes (equities, credit, commodities, rates, currencies).
• Rejects market timing and stock picking in favor of systematic, repeatable edge.

Strategy Spectrum

• Equity Style Funds: Single-factor (value, momentum, quality) and multi-factor blends.
• Alternatives: Absolute-return, market-neutral, arbitrage, and global-macro vehicles.
• 130/30 Portfolios: Enhanced long/short framework leveraging mild shorting to boost alpha.
• UCITS & Mutual Funds: Bring institutional-grade quant to individual investors worldwide.

Risk Management & Culture

• Risk is measured before return is earned—statistical discipline is the firm’s first language.
• Emphasizes low correlation to traditional equity beta; diversification is the core product.
• After a tough 2018 (-34 %), AQR tightened models and re-optimized execution — discipline over ego.
• Consistently ranks as one of the best employers in money management (P&I 2023 list).

Founder — Cliff Asness

• Managing & Founding Principal; former Director of Quant Research at Goldman Sachs AM.
• Co-created Goldman’s Global Alpha Fund, one of the first quant macro vehicles.
• Outspoken advocate for evidence-based investing and humor-laced blog commentary on markets and academia.

Funds & Access

• Offers ~40 strategies across equity & alternatives; vehicles include LPs, mutual funds, and UCITS.
• Institutional clients: pension plans, endowments, insurers, foundations, and sovereign funds.
• Retail access via AQR mutual funds and global UCITS platforms.
• Minimum investment ≈ $5 million for private funds; lower for mutual funds.

Portfolio Snapshot

• Thousands of positions; no single holding > 3 % weight.
• Exposure spans mega-cap tech, financials, industrials, and commodities with carefully balanced factor weights.
• Turnover varies from weeks to years depending on signal horizon.

Fee Structure

Typical range ≈ 1–2 % management + 15–30 % performance fee (depending on vehicle and mandate). UCITS ≈ 1.4 % + 15 %. Managed accounts similar but tiered by size.

What I Like / Dislike

• Like: Quant discipline, academic credibility, diversified style toolkit, rich research portal, transparent methodology.
• Dislike: Occasional underperformance in factor reversals; requires long-term patience and faith in statistics.

Recent Notes

• 2023–25: Strengthened data pipeline and AI-driven execution; expanding retail education initiatives globally.

Learn more: Visit AQR Capital Management

↑ Back to top

---

8. D.E. Shaw — Full Review

Note: Founded by computer-science visionary David E. Shaw, this is the hedge fund where quantitative finance grew up and never looked back.

Profile

• Founded in 1988 by David E. Shaw — Stanford Ph.D., former Columbia professor, and one-time Morgan Stanley prop-trader.
• Headquarters: New York City · AUM ≈ $60 billion (2025) · ~2,500 employees worldwide.
• Famous alumni include Jeff Bezos (Amazon founder) and a fleet of scientists with 24 International Math Olympiad medals and hundreds of papers between them.

Investment Approach

• Runs three pillars: systematic models, discretionary teams, and hybrid strategies combining both.
• Systematic equity and futures strategies apply risk-aware stock selection and macro bets across rates, FX, and commodities.
• Discretionary arms cover credit, energy, reinsurance, private equity, and renewables — where human judgment still adds value.
• Every trade lives inside a mathematical framework that tests decades of data before deploying a dollar.

Risk Management

• Risk is central culture, not a department. The firm’s Risk Committee includes the Chief Risk Officer, Executive Committee members, and rotating managing directors.
• All portfolio managers are considered risk managers; capital allocation adjusts continuously to correlation and volatility shifts.
• Shaw’s team refined these principles through crashes from ’98 to ’08 and beyond — a rare quant firm that improved with every storm.

Founder — David E. Shaw

• Scientist-entrepreneur worth ≈ $8 billion (Forbes 2025). Served on U.S. Presidential Science Advisory Councils under Clinton and Obama.
• Now splits time between philanthropy and computational biochemistry research while remaining the firm’s guiding intellect.

Funds & Vehicles

• Alternative Investments: Absolute-return funds seeking low correlation to traditional markets.
• Long-Oriented Strategies: Active Equity (2000) for institutional custom index exposures.
• Orienteer (2013): Global multi-asset program blending systematic signals with select alpha trades.

Portfolio Snapshot

• Highly diversified; no position > 4 % weight.
• Top names include big tech and blue-chip staples; most positions ≈ 1 % or less.
• Holding periods span weeks to years — a blend of high-frequency and strategic core.

Minimum Investment & Fees

• Accredited investors only (≈ $1 million net worth or $200 k income standard).
• Minimum entry ≈ $1 million per fund variant.
• Fees range widely: management ~1 – 3.5 %; performance 15 – 35 %, tiered by fund and liquidity terms.

What I Like / Dislike

• Like: Elite quant talent, deep risk infrastructure, and diversified return streams spanning decades.
• Dislike: Complexity and opacity make it hard for outsiders to mirror or verify strategy shifts.

Recent Notes

• In 2024 the firm relocates its HQ to Two Manhattan West in Hudson Yards — eight floors of servers, screens, and smarts.

Learn more: Visit D.E. Shaw & Co.

↑ Back to top

---

9. Baker Brothers Advisors — Full Review

Note: A rare example of a hedge fund built on scientific literacy and patient capital — a laboratory for long-term biotech conviction.

Profile

• Founded in 2000 by Felix and Julian Baker; seeded by the Tisch Family.
• Headquarters: New York City · AUM ≈ $23 billion (2025).
• Pure-play life-sciences focus with decades-long relationships across pharma boards and research networks.

Investment Philosophy

• Vertical-specific expertise in biotech and healthcare — eschews diversification for depth and diligence.
• Average holding period > 3 years; often a decade or longer for core winners.
• Seeks commercial-stage biotechs or late-development firms with clear path to profitability and buyout appeal.
• Portfolio construction reflects Buffett’s quote: “Diversification is protection against ignorance.”

Portfolio Structure

• Hyper-concentrated: ≈ 50 % of assets in two names (Beigene Ltd BGNE, Incyte INCY).
• Total positions ≈ 117 but the long tail (< 1 % each) manages risk while fostering idea discovery.
• Minimal exposure to big pharma (PFE, JNJ) or managed care (UNH) — it’s pure biotech DNA.

Risk Management

• Focus on commercial-stage or near-profit biotechs limits binary risk relative to early-stage peers.
• Long-term orientation absorbs sector drawdowns and reduces taxable turnover.
• High conviction acts as a filter against noise — the Bakers understand the difference between a temporary selloff and a failed trial.

Founders — Felix & Julian Baker

• Felix: B.S. & Ph.D. in Immunology from Stanford; served on boards of Seattle Genetics (now Pfizer), Alexion (now AstraZeneca), and others.
• Julian: A.B. magna cum laude from Harvard; director at Incyte, Acadia Pharma, Prelude Therapeutics, and more.
• Each worth ≈ $2.8 billion (Forbes 2025); known for hands-on engagement with science teams and C-suites alike.

Funds & Access

• Private pooled vehicles for institutional investors and family offices only.
• No main website and no retail distribution; information comes via SEC filings (13F/ADV).
• Minimum investment and fees undisclosed but typical hedge-fund ranges apply (1–2 % + performance fee).

Performance & Legacy

• Track record of anticipating M&A targets — early stakes in Seattle Genetics and Alexion became legendary exits.
• Long-term compounding from Incyte position (est. 2001) illustrates patience as strategy.
• Despite sector volatility, Baker Bros ranks among top biotech funds by 10-yr CAGR returns.

What I Like / Dislike

• Like: Scientific expertise rare in finance, phenomenal due diligence, and a portfolio that doubles as a watchlist for serious biotech investors.
• Dislike: Sector concentration means periodic pain; retail investors can only observe, not participate directly.

Recent Notes

• 2024: Exited Seattle Genetics stake after Pfizer merger — a multi-decade home run closing the loop on their original thesis.

Learn more: Baker Bros on Whale Wisdom

↑ Back to top

---

10. Balyasny Asset Management — Full Review

Profile

• Founded in 2001 by Dmitry Balyasny, Scott Schroeder, and Taylor O’Malley; HQ Chicago with 16+ global offices.
• ~1,500 team members across 150+ investment teams; AUM ≈ $120B (firm materials).
• Platform model: multiple sector PM pods operating within shared risk, tech, data, and execution infrastructure.

Strategies

• Core: Equities Long/Short via fundamental, bottom-up stock selection.
• Plus: Macro, Equity Arbitrage / Event, Credit, Commodities, and Growth Equity (BAM Elevate for private tech/tech-enabled).
• Goal: consistent absolute returns across regimes via diversified, complementary sleeves.

Risk Management

• 2018 was an inflection point (AUM drawdown, layoffs). The firm hired CRO Alex Lurye (ex-Citadel risk leader) and embedded risk deeper into PM workflows.
• Portfolio construction uses factor exposures, stress tests, liquidity ladders, and capital buffers to contain tails.
• Liquidity controls: avoid concentration breaches even in liquid assets; pre-modeled liquidation timelines under stress.

Leadership

• Dmitry Balyasny — Managing Partner & CIO; early career at Schonfeld. Influenced by individual-responsibility philosophies; active in philanthropy.
• Taylor O’Malley — President; chairs Global Macro Strategy Committee; oversees Risk, Tech, Data Intelligence, and Ops.
• Scott Schroeder — Business Development and legal/regulatory head.

Funds & Vehicles (selected)

• Atlas-family funds across macro, enhanced, master, and private holdings; minimums vary by vehicle (some $0–$25M per class as disclosed in filings).
• Client base spans institutions, SWFs, endowments, FOFs, family offices, and HNW.

Portfolio Snapshot

• Highly diversified; few single names > 2.5% weight.
• Large use of ETFs (e.g., Russell 2000) for exposure shaping and hedging.
• Construction echoes other platforms (AQR, D.E. Shaw) in diversification discipline, though BAM remains more fundamental L/S at heart.

Minimums & Fees

• Accredited/qualified investors; minimums often around $5M but vary by fund/class.
• Typical hedge-fund economics: management fee on AUM plus performance incentive; see offering docs for specifics.

Performance Notes & Culture

• Strong pre-2018 record (double-digit annualized) and resilience across the dot-com bust and GFC; 2018 reset catalyzed a risk-first rebuild.
• Current BAM emphasizes coaching, analytics, and playbooks that make PMs sturdier across regimes.

What I Like / Dislike

• Like: Measured post-2018 transformation; deep sector benches; risk is now a muscle, not a memo.
• Dislike: Platform complexity can dilute edge if PM selection/pruning lags; individuals can’t easily replicate the infra.

Recent Notes

• Continued global build-out (including Asia/Middle East) and expansion of data/tech pipelines to support pods.

Learn more: BAM website

↑ Back to top

---

11. Tiger Global — Full Review

Profile

• Founded 2001 by Chase Coleman III, a Julian Robertson “Tiger Cub.” HQ: New York.
• AUM figures have fluctuated with market cycles; the platform spans public L/S and private growth equity.
• Formerly “Tiger Technology”; distinct from Tiger Management (closed) and Tiger Asia.

Two Engines

• Public Equity: Long/short flagship (Tiger Global Investments) and a long-only sleeve (Long Opportunities), concentrated in leaders with secular tailwinds.
• Private Equity: Growth stakes in category-defining companies riding internet/software/consumer/fintech S-curves.

Strategy DNA

• Hunts for moaty, founder-led businesses with operating leverage and giant TAMs.
• Barbell of public and private lets Tiger ride trends across lifecycle phases — but also compounds regime risk.

Risk Management (and Lessons)

• 2020: Stellar gains (≈ $10B for investors).
• 2022: One of the industry’s largest drawdowns as multiples de-rated; long-only fared worse.
• Reset: Trimmed speculative exposure, rebalanced to durable mega-caps (MSFT, META, GOOGL, etc.), added more shorts, and re-underwrote China stakes.
• Key lesson: liquidity regime changes can overpower even great company selection; sizing and hedging are existential.

Founder — Chase Coleman

• Began under Robertson in 1997; received ~$25M to launch Tiger Global when Tiger Management wound down.
• Net worth ≈ multi-billion (Forbes), emblematic of the “Tiger Cub” tradition of aggressive but research-driven growth investing.

Funds & Vehicles

• 20 pooled vehicles; seven hedge funds within the platform.
• Flagship: Tiger Global Investments, LP (~$35B historically). Other sleeves: Long Opportunities and multiple private funds.
• Minimums typically ≈ $1M and up for hedge sleeves; private funds vary widely.

Portfolio Snapshot

• Concentrated top book: META and MSFT have represented a large combined weight; top five can exceed 50%.
• Sector focus: internet/software/consumer/fintech leaders with network effects and strong unit economics.
• Private pipeline supplies future public ideas; public winners fund patience in privates.

Fees

• Typical hedge economics: ~1.25–1.5% management for public funds; ~2% for private funds; performance fees ~20% (public) and 20–25% (private).

What I Like / Dislike

• Like: Pattern-recognition in tech moats; cross-over lens across private/public; a watchlist of tomorrow’s leaders.
• Dislike: Volatility and regime sensitivity; 2022 showed process needs to flex faster when liquidity tides turn.

Recent Notes

• 2023 rebound (+28.5%) after portfolio overhaul; continued fundraising for early-stage growth despite tighter VC tape.

Learn more: Tiger Global

↑ Back to top

---

12. Millennium Management — Full Review

Note: Founded in 1989, Millennium built a fortress of risk systems and diversification long before “multi-strategy” was cool.

Profile

• Founded by Israel Englander in 1989 with $35M; now manages ≈ $60B+ in AUM.
• Headquartered in New York City with ~5,500 employees worldwide.
• One of the largest and most profitable hedge-fund organizations globally.

Strategy Framework

• Operates a multi-manager, multi-strategy model spanning:
  • Fundamental Equity — long/short stock selection by sector teams.
  • Equity Arbitrage — merger, event-driven, and volatility trades.
  • Fixed Income & Macro — rates, credit, mortgages, commodities.
  • Quantitative — systematic strategies across asset classes.
• Hundreds of independent PM pods operate with ring-fenced capital and strict risk budgets.
• Goal: steady, market-neutral alpha aggregation through diversified micro-edges.

Risk Management

• Millennium’s hallmark is risk control: every PM operates under real-time surveillance for leverage, factor drift, and drawdown.
• Diversified across thousands of securities — only index trackers like SPY, QQQ, and IWM exceed 1% position weight.
• Rarely experiences major drawdowns; compounding ≈14% annually since inception (per reports).

Founder — Israel Englander

• NYU-trained finance graduate; early career on the American Stock Exchange as trader and specialist.
• Still CEO and 100% owner; widely respected for discipline and privacy.
• Net worth ≈ multi-billion range; known for long-term staff loyalty and culture of discretion.

Performance Record

• Among the top 5 all-time cumulative profit generators in hedge-fund history (per LCH rankings).
• Over $22B+ in net gains for investors since inception.
• Annualized ≈14% over 35+ years — exceptional for such scale and diversification.

Portfolio Snapshot

• ~7,000 securities; extremely diversified.
• Top 3–4 positions are ETFs (SPY, QQQ, IWM) used for beta and liquidity control.
• Broad exposure to mega-cap tech, healthcare, consumer staples, and industrial leaders.

Fees & Access

• Private funds only; minimums undisclosed and vary widely.
• Standard hedge-fund fee mix: management fee + performance incentive; exact figures not public.

What I Like / Dislike

• Like: Peerless consistency, diversified structure, stable leadership.
• Dislike: Spartan public disclosures — learning from Millennium means inference, not reading.

Recent Notes

• 2023: Millennium seeded Diego Megia’s spinout Taula Capital ($3B macro fund launching 2024).

Learn more: Millennium Management

↑ Back to top

---

13. Two Sigma — Full Review

Note: A technological tour de force, blending computer science, finance, and machine learning into one of the world’s most advanced investing engines.

Profile

• Founded in 2001 by John Overdeck, David Siegel, and Mark Pickard.
• HQ: New York City · AUM ≈ $60B · ~2,000 employees.
• Name “Two Sigma” nods to volatility (σ) and the sum (Σ) of many signals — math meets metaphor.

Investment Framework

• Principles rooted in technology, data science, and AI more than traditional finance.
• Leverages ML engines (like proprietary system Halite) and vast alternative datasets to predict risk and return.
• Over two-thirds of staff are in R&D; infrastructure includes 775k+ virtual CPUs and 5,000 TB of memory — yes, terabytes.
• Goal: consistent, low-correlation alpha through statistical insight and portfolio diversification.

Risk Management

• Quantitative to its core: risk measured at every level — asset, factor, region, and model uncertainty.
• Created Venn (2017), an analytics platform that helps institutional investors model portfolio risks and correlations.
• Diversification is religion; over 3,000 positions with minimal single-stock exposure (<1% weights).

Founders & Origins

• Overdeck and Siegel met at D.E. Shaw (yes, same alumni tree as Bezos and Asness).
• Overdeck — International Math Olympiad medalist, Stanford grad, early Amazon engineer.
• Siegel — MIT Ph.D. in computer science; former CIO at Tudor Investment Corp.
• Seed funding from Paul Tudor Jones jump-started operations in 2001.
• Mark Pickard served as President until retirement (2006).

Funds & Products

• Flagships include Two Sigma Spectrum Portfolio (~$15B), Equity Portfolio (~$12B), Strategies Fund (~$10B), and others.
• Two Sigma Impact (private equity arm) raised $677M in 2023 for mission-driven investments.
• Access mostly institutional; retail and even accredited access remains limited.

Portfolio Snapshot

• ~3,400 holdings; no position >1% weight; top positions are ETFs like QQQ and SPY.
• Exposure: mega-cap tech (NVDA, TSLA, NFLX, V, NKE, GOOGL) plus small factor-driven positions.
• Blends systematic long/short equity with multi-asset overlays across rates, FX, and commodities.

Fees & Access

• Institutional focus; typical management 2–4%, performance 20–30% depending on strategy.
• Individual access minimal outside public feeder vehicles (if open).

What I Like / Dislike

• Like: World-class infrastructure, strong performance, AI-first ethos, educational outreach (Venn).
• Dislike: Founders’ rift (Overdeck vs. Siegel) could disrupt culture; limited transparency.

Recent Notes

• 2023: Two Sigma Impact fund launch closed oversubscribed; continued R&D on multi-agent AI trading frameworks.

Learn more: Two Sigma

↑ Back to top

---

14. Viking Global Investors — Full Review

Profile

• Founded in 1999 by Ole Andreas Halvorsen, Brian Olson, and David Ott (all Tiger Management alumni).
• HQ: Greenwich, CT; AUM reportedly under $50B across public and private strategies.
• Families of funds: Viking Global Equities (long/short, 1999), Viking Long Funds (long-only, 2009), and Viking Global Opportunities (liquid/illiquid, 2015).

Strategy Framework

• Public Equity: High-conviction long and short investments, organized by sector verticals (tech, healthcare, consumer, industrials, etc.). The engine is fundamental research: business model quality, durability of cash flows, management quality, and competitive moats.
• Private Equity: From disruptive early-stage names to mature firms on credible paths to profitability; preference for founder/management teams able to scale sustainably.
• Process: Intensive primary work (expert calls, channel checks), structured valuation, and portfolio construction guardrails (exposure limits, stop-loss/risk budgets).

Risk Management

• Reasonably diversified across ~100 public positions; top names typically include mega-cap quality (Visa, Amazon, Microsoft, Danaher, UnitedHealth, Meta).
• Position sizing reflects liquidity and thesis maturity; historically few positions >5% (Visa sometimes an exception).
• History includes periods of scale adjustments (e.g., 2017 capital return); reports suggest the flagship long/short fund reopened to new capital in 2023.

Founder — Ole A. Halvorsen

• Norwegian origin; Williams College (Economics) and Stanford GSB (MBA).
• Ex-Tiger Management senior MD; sits at the intersection of tight risk discipline and long-form fundamental work.

Performance & Portfolio Snapshot

• Track record is relatively consistent versus peers, though not the absolute fastest compounding among Tiger Cubs in every window.
• Portfolio skew: diversified quality compounders plus selective growth; measured sleeves in earlier-stage names (DNA, ADPT historically small).
• Concentration: ~30% in top 7 holdings; broad tail of smaller positions for optionality.

Access, Minimums & Fees

• Clients include endowments, pensions, sovereigns, funds, and HNWIs.
• Minimums commonly cited around $5M for several funds; availability varies.
• Fee mix: monthly management fee of ~0.125% (i.e., 1.5% annualized) plus ~20% performance fee (net of losses), subject to fund terms.

What I Like / Dislike

• Like: Durable research culture; balanced across public/private; good lessons in position sizing and thesis hygiene.
• Dislike: Episodic scale adjustments; access can tighten; at times a step behind the very top performers.

Recent Notes

• Market chatter indicates the flagship L/S may have reopened to capital in 2023 after a decade-plus; watching for formal confirmation.

Learn more: Viking Global Investors

↑ Back to top

---

15. ARK Invest — Full Review

Profile

• Founded by Cathie Wood (2014 for ARK; note: early bio milestones date to the 1990s/2000s at AllianceBernstein/GSAM).
• HQ: St. Petersburg, FL; <100 professionals.
• AUM swung from ~$50B (Feb 2021 peak) to the mid-teens by 2022 after sharp underperformance; trend subsequently stabilized with market recovery.

Strategy Framework

• Active ETFs: The flagship ARKK (Innovation) plus ARKQ (Autonomy/Robotics), ARKG (Genomics), ARKW (Next-Gen Internet), ARKF (Fintech), ARKX (Space), among others.
• Venture Access: Retail-friendly ARK Venture lowers the bar to a historically exclusive asset class (min as low as $500).
• Theme: Disruptive innovation—AI, genomics/CRISPR, robotics, energy storage, blockchain, space infrastructure.
• Target: Seek names that can double over ~5 years (implied ~15% CAGR+) based on ARK’s open models and research memos.

Risk Management & Volatility

• High beta by construction; no cash sleeves in ETFs, so “cash-like innovation” (mega-cap tech) sometimes acts as ballast.
• Rates sensitive: higher discount rates compress long-duration growth equity valuations.
• Concentration: ARKK often holds 35–55 names; top 10 can be ~60–65% of weight (e.g., COIN, ROKU, TSLA historically).
• Transparency is a feature: daily trades, holdings emails, live research streams—great for education and gauging thesis shifts.

Founder — Cathie Wood

• USC (Finance & Econ, summa); mentored by economist Arthur Laffer.
• Former CIO of global thematic strategies at AllianceBernstein; launched ARK after proposing active ETFs focused on innovation.
• Performance has been cyclical: standout 2020, deep 2021–22 drawdowns, subsequent rebounds; positioning evolves with thesis work and macro.

Vehicles, Minimums & Fees

• ARKK: Expense ratio ~0.75%. Most ARK ETFs sit in the 0.75–0.85% zone.
• ARK Venture: management ~2.75%, total net expense ratio ~2.90%, min investment ~$500 (distinct retail angle).
• Access: ETFs trade on exchanges (e.g., NYSE Arca); no accreditation required for the ETFs.

Portfolio Snapshot (ARKK as anchor)

• Top exposures frequently include category leaders and platforms (e.g., TSLA, COIN, ROKU, PATH, ZM—mix changes with research and flows).
• Cross-fund overlap is common; holdings may appear in 3–4 ARK ETFs if they sit at the intersection of multiple themes.

What I Like / Dislike

• Like: Radical transparency; differentiated frameworks on S-curve adoption; daily signals for readers building growth baskets.
• Dislike: Volatility is the toll; some earlier-stage names may never cross the profitability chasm; crowding and liquidity can magnify swings.

Recent Notes

• ARK continues to expand tooling (open models, podcasts, research decks) and to refine cross-theme exposure (AI × Genomics × Robotics) as platform plays emerge.

Learn more: ARK Invest

↑ Back to top

---

16. Davidson Kempner — Full Review

Profile

• Founded 1983 by Marvin Davidson (ret. 2004) and Thomas Kempner (ret. 2020); led today by Anthony A. Yoseloff (Executive Managing Member & CIO).
• HQ: New York City; ~500 employees; ~$37B AUM across evergreen and drawdown vehicles.

Strategy Framework

• Event-Driven / Multi-Strategy: Bottom-up, catalyst-oriented investing spanning credit and equity.
• Credit: Corporate & structured credit, convertible arb, long/short credit, private lending.
• Equity: Merger arb, special situations, long/short equity, selective private equity.
• Real Assets: Opportunistic sleeves in real estate, infrastructure, renewables, aircraft, shipping.
• Structured Capital: Custom solutions across capital structures for idiosyncratic outcomes.

Risk Management

• Capital preservation as a first principle; one of the fund’s worst years (2008) reportedly <10% drawdown.
• Diversified book (300+ positions typical). Heavy singular exposures can appear around hard catalysts (e.g., ATVI pre-MSFT deal close), but position risk is sized relative to merger odds/timing.
• Partner capital is significant alongside clients—useful alignment in complex situations.

Leadership

• Anthony Yoseloff oversees strategy and risk; sits on multiple institutional boards (e.g., Princeton’s PRINCO board, NYPL investment committee), reinforcing a long-horizon governance mindset.

Vehicles, Access & Fees

• ~45 pooled vehicles (30+ hedge funds). Representative funds include:
  • Davidson Kempner International, Ltd. (~$10B; min ~$3M)
  • Davidson Kempner Institutional Partners, LP (~$9.7B; min ~$5M)
  • Davidson Kempner Partners (~$4.3B; min ~$5M)
  • Distressed Opportunities International (~$2B; min ~$2M)
• Minimums generally $2–5M (accredited/qualified status required; availability varies).
• Indicative fees: management 0.5%–1.75% depending on vehicle (e.g., 1.5% on committed for long-term funds); performance fees generally ~20% (15% for some special-opp sleeves). Check offering docs.

Portfolio Snapshot

• Core: catalyst-linked holdings across credit/equity; mix of mainstream (META, WMT, etc.) and “off-the-run” names.
• Past outsized positions tied to corporate actions (e.g., ATVI pre-acquisition) reflect risk-adjusted spread math, not speculative concentration.

What I Like / Dislike

• Like: 40-year durability; thoughtful risk control; rich hunting ground for event-driven/credit ideas; meaningful partner coinvestment.
• Dislike: Compounding rate can trail high-beta stars in rip-roaring bull markets; access and transparency are institutional by design.

Recent Notes

• Jul 2023: Closed Opportunities Fund VI at ~$3.0B—continued appetite for complex, catalyst-driven credit/equity.

Learn more: Davidson Kempner

↑ Back to top

---

17. Coatue Management — Full Review

Profile

• Founded in 1999 by Philippe Laffont (MIT CS; ex-Tiger Management analyst). Brother Thomas Laffont co-leads private investing.
• HQ: New York City; staff <200; AUM ≈ $40B+ spanning public, long-only, hybrid, and private funds.
• “East Meets West” annual conference convenes global tech founders and CEOs; strong network effects for deal flow and insight.

Strategy Framework

• Public Tech Equity (since 1999): Disciplined, long-term growth investing in category leaders across AI/cloud, semis, consumer internet, fintech, and healthcare tech.
• Private / Growth: From early to late stage; structured equity toolkit allows non-dilutive solutions for founders and flexible capital through cycles.
• Data Platform: In-house data science overlays 200+ proprietary datasets to benchmark KPIs, inform hiring/fundraising, and sharpen GTM strategy.

Risk Management

• Moderately concentrated public book (top 5 ≈ 40% weight) with 300+ total positions for breadth.
• Bias to blue-chip tech leaders (NVDA, META, AMZN, AMD, MSFT, TSLA, etc.) balanced with a pipeline of emerging disruptors.
• Private marks and tech cyclicality can amplify volatility; Coatue uses structure (convertible/structured equity) to cushion drawdowns for portfolio companies.

Founder — Philippe Laffont

• MIT CS (1991); McKinsey alum; Tiger Management telecom analyst (1996).
• Combines Tiger-style fundamental rigor with a platform approach to founder support and data.

Funds & Access

• ~40 pooled vehicles; ~10 are hedge funds across offshore/onshore structures and long-only sleeves.
• Examples: Coatue Offshore Master Fund LP (~$22B), Offshore Fund, Ltd. (~$7.5B), Qualified Partners LP (~$6B), Long Only Offshore Master (~$5B), plus hybrid and private funds (e.g., Early Stage, Private Funds II).
• Minimums often around $5M (varies by vehicle); investor base is largely institutional and qualified.

Portfolio Snapshot

• Public equity: tech-heavy with semis, hyperscale platforms, and software leaders; top weights frequently include NVDA, META, AMZN, AMD, MSFT.
• Private pipeline: fintech, climate tech, AI infrastructure/apps, and TMT adjacencies; structured equity used to avoid punitive down rounds.

Fees

• Fixed fee typically 0–2.5% of AUM (or committed capital/cost basis per docs), plus performance fees of ~10–33% depending on strategy/vehicle.
• Standard institutional provisions (fee breaks for affiliates/classes) and pass-throughs where applicable; always check offering docs.

What I Like / Dislike About Coatue

• Like: Secular-trend mapping; founder support + data platform; public/private idea flywheel; consistently fertile idea source for readers.
• Dislike: Tech beta and private-mark lag can sting in fast drawdowns; access limited for most individuals.

Recent Notes

• Raised ≈$3B for a structured-equity fund to help private companies bridge valuations without down rounds; continued focus on AI and climate-tech stacks.

Learn more: Coatue Management

---

What Are Hedge Funds?

Definition: Hedge funds are private pooled vehicles (typically for accredited/qualified investors) that deploy a wide range of strategies—long/short equity, event-driven, merger arb, macro, credit, quant/systematic—often with leverage and shorting, aiming for risk-adjusted excess returns.

How Fees Work (Remuneration)

• Management fee: commonly 1–2% of AUM (multi-manager platforms can be higher after pass-throughs).
• Performance fee: commonly ~20% of net profits (sometimes 10–33% depending on vehicle), often with high-water mark.
• Note: Some platforms effectively run “7-and-20” after internal costs and PM payouts.

Common Strategies

• Long/Short Equity: pair longs with shorts to isolate stock-picking from market beta.
• Event-Driven / Merger Arb: trade spreads around M&A, spin-offs, restructurings.
• Credit / Distressed: capital-structure work across loans, bonds, converts, special situations.
• Global Macro: rates, FX, commodities, and indices around macro regimes.
• Quant / Systematic: factors, stat-arb, trend, and machine-learning signals.

Hedge Funds vs. Mutual Funds

• Access: Hedge funds = accredited/qualified; mutual funds/ETFs = public.
• Instruments: Hedge funds can use shorts, derivatives, leverage, privates; mutuals are typically long-only public securities.
• Liquidity: Hedge funds may have lockups/gates; mutuals/ETFs offer daily liquidity.
• Fees: Hedge funds charge materially more than the ~0.40% average mutual/ETF expense ratio.

What to Diligence

• People: PM/firm bios, incentives, team stability.
• Process: Strategy repeatability, edge, risk framework.
• Numbers: Track record construction, drawdowns, leverage, exposures.
• Terms: Fees, minimums, liquidity (lockups, gates), transparency.

Executive Summary

This guide profiles a cross-section of leading hedge funds—activists vs. quants, multi-manager platforms, credit/event specialists, and public-private tech investors—to help readers compare strategy, risk, access, and idea flow. Minimums and fees vary widely; most vehicles remain institutionally oriented. Use these profiles for idea mining, portfolio construction cues (sizing, diversification, downside control), and a clearer view of how the best hedge funds pursue repeatable alpha.

What’s next on Funanc1al: potential additions include Man Group, Lone Pine, Farallon, and classic figures/shops (e.g., Carl Icahn, David Einhorn/Greenlight, George Soros retrospectives). Stay tuned.